Group-safe
All derivatives of one base document stayed in one split.
Research overview
Can explicit texture or edge representations improve presentation-attack detection over a semantic ConvNeXt baseline?
The study classifies bona fide identity-document captures, printed reproductions, and documents recaptured from a screen. It does not evaluate identity matching, liveness guarantees, or fraud prevention in production.
A proposed DLC-2021 + SIDTD four-class benchmark was rejected as the primary protocol because dataset source could deterministically reveal the composite class. Protocol A-Reduced instead uses 300 DLC-2021 samples balanced across three genuine classes.
Texture produced the highest observed test Macro-F1, driven primarily by PRINT performance. Edge improved over the semantic baseline overall, while SCREEN F1 fell in that configuration.
All derivatives of one base document stayed in one split.
Early stopping and checkpoint selection used validation Macro-F1.
The 44-sample test set was evaluated once after selection.
These are descriptive results from a reduced protocol and one primary seed. M4 and M5 also use projections and a deeper classifier than M3, so comparisons are not perfectly head-matched causal ablations.